2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1991 Italdesign M12
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Italdesign M12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Italdesign M12 would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1991 Italdesign M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Italdesign M12 (300 HP) has 121 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Italdesign M12 should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Italdesign M12 (450 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (245 Nm). This means 1991 Italdesign M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1991 Italdesign M12 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Italdesign |
| Model | CTS | M12 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1991 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 4988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 300 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 84.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2600 mm |
