2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1992 Rover 220
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 220 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1992 Rover 220. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 467 kg more than 1992 Rover 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 220, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 220. (180 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 220.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1992 Rover 220 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | CTS | 220 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1153 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 55 L |