2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1993 Mazda 121
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 121. (71 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 800 kg more than 1993 Mazda 121. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 121. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1993 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | CTS | 121 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 43 L |