2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1994 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,205 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 30 kg more than 1994 Daewoo Arcadia.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1994 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | Cadillac | Daewoo |
| Model | CTS | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 3205 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4960 mm |
