2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1995 Daewoo No 1
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo No 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo No 1 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1. 1995 Daewoo No 1 has automatic transmission and 2003 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2003 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Daewoo No 1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1995 Daewoo No 1 | |
Make | Cadillac | Daewoo |
Model | CTS | No 1 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |