2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1995 Mazda MS-8
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MS-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MS-8 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 395 kg more than 1995 Mazda MS-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1995 Mazda MS-8 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | CTS | MS-8 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3563 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1760 mm |
