2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1995 SsangYong Chairman H
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 SsangYong Chairman H. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 SsangYong Chairman H would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 SsangYong Chairman H, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (346 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 SsangYong Chairman H. (312 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 SsangYong Chairman H. 1995 SsangYong Chairman H has automatic transmission and 2003 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2003 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 SsangYong Chairman H will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1995 SsangYong Chairman H | |
Make | Cadillac | SsangYong |
Model | CTS | Chairman H |
Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 346 Nm | 312 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |