2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1996 Toyota Conquest
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Conquest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Conquest would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1996 Toyota Conquest. (174 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota Conquest. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 504 kg more than 1996 Toyota Conquest. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Toyota Conquest. (135 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Toyota Conquest.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1996 Toyota Conquest | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | CTS | Conquest |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1973 cc |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1116 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2740 mm |
