2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1998 Honda SSM
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda SSM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda SSM would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Honda SSM (286 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (245 Nm). This means 1998 Honda SSM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1998 Honda SSM | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | CTS | SSM |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 286 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2580 mm |
