2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mahindra Bolero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mahindra Bolero would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra Bolero. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 160 kg more than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2000 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mahindra Bolero. (166 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mahindra Bolero.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 2000 Mahindra Bolero | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mahindra |
| Model | CTS | Bolero |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 2523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1780 kg |
