2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 2001 Volvo Hatric
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Volvo Hatric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Volvo Hatric would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo Hatric (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo Hatric should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 169 kg more than 2001 Volvo Hatric.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo Hatric (280 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (245 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo Hatric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Cadillac CTS. 2001 Volvo Hatric has automatic transmission and 2003 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2003 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo Hatric will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 2001 Volvo Hatric | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | CTS | Hatric |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 2442 cc |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 68 L |
