2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 2002 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mahindra Bolero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mahindra Bolero would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 107 kg more than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2002 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (346 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra Bolero.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 2002 Mahindra Bolero | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mahindra |
| Model | CTS | Bolero |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 3563 cc | 2523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 346 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1782 kg |
