2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 445 kg more than 2007 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | CTS | Clio |
Year Released | 2003 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1461 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 17.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 55 L |