2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 2009 Pontiac Solstice

To start off, 2009 Pontiac Solstice is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2009 Pontiac Solstice. (173 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2009 Pontiac Solstice.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Pontiac Solstice. (226 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Pontiac Solstice.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Cadillac CTS 2009 Pontiac Solstice
Make Cadillac Pontiac
Model CTS Solstice
Year Released 2003 2009
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2597 cc 2384 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 179 HP 173 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 226 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 9.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4000 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1280 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2420 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 49 L