2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 2010 Alfa Romeo 147

To start off, 2010 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2010 Alfa Romeo 147. (148 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2010 Alfa Romeo 147. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 295 kg more than 2010 Alfa Romeo 147. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Alfa Romeo 147. (181 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Alfa Romeo 147.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Cadillac CTS 2010 Alfa Romeo 147
Make Cadillac Alfa Romeo
Model CTS 147
Year Released 2003 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2597 cc 1970 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 179 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6300 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 181 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 3800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.3 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 91 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1325 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4230 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2550 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 60 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]