2003 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1961 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1730 kg more than 1961 Triumph Herald.
Because 2003 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Triumph Herald. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac Escalade | 1961 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | Escalade | Herald |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5967 cc | 948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2320 mm |
