2003 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1320 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac Escalade | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | Escalade | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 91 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |
