2003 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1967 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 6,490 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 521 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2003 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac Escalade | 1967 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Escalade | Impala |
Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 6490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 325 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 1969 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3030 mm |