2003 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1968 Mercury Marauder
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercury Marauder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercury Marauder would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Mercury Marauder is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 495 kg more than 1968 Mercury Marauder.
Because 2003 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mercury Marauder. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac Escalade | 1968 Mercury Marauder | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
| Model | Escalade | Marauder |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5967 cc | 6392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 171 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 1995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3160 mm |
