2003 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1969 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 595 kg more than 1969 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2003 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1969 Chevrolet Impala has manual transmission. 1969 Chevrolet Impala will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac Escalade | 1969 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Escalade | Impala |
Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 5733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 166 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 1895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3100 mm |