2003 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1976 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1800 kg more than 1976 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 2003 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1976 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 1976 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac Escalade | 1976 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
Model | Escalade | Polo |
Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 895 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 39 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2340 mm |