2003 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1625 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2003 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1982 Nissan Pulsar has manual transmission. 1982 Nissan Pulsar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac Escalade | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | Escalade | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2420 mm |