2003 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 780 kg more than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Because 2003 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager has manual transmission. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac Escalade | 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | Escalade | Grand Voyager |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3040 mm |