2003 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2000 Lada 110
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada 110 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1420 kg more than 2000 Lada 110.
Because 2003 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lada 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 2000 Lada 110 has manual transmission. 2000 Lada 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac Escalade | 2000 Lada 110 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | Escalade | 110 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1977 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2500 mm |