2003 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2001 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1045 kg more than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Because 2003 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford Econovan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 2001 Ford Econovan has manual transmission. 2001 Ford Econovan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac Escalade | 2001 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Escalade | Econovan |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2210 mm |