2003 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2001 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MCC Smart would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1770 kg more than 2001 MCC Smart.
Because 2003 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac Escalade | 2001 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Cadillac | MCC |
| Model | Escalade | Smart |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5967 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 2600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 1820 mm |
