2003 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2002 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 410 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet Astro.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac Escalade | 2002 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Escalade | Astro |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 2080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2830 mm |