2003 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2012 Maybach 62
To start off, 2012 Maybach 62 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Maybach 62 weights approximately 386 kg more than 2003 Cadillac Escalade.
Because 2003 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Maybach 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac Escalade | 2012 Maybach 62 | |
Make | Cadillac | Maybach |
Model | Escalade | 62 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 620 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 2876 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 6165 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1981 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1575 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3828 mm |