2003 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1650 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2003 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac Escalade | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Cadillac | Smart |
Model | Escalade | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 1867 mm |