2003 Cadillac Seville vs. 1952 Toyota SA
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Seville is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Toyota SA would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac Seville (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 1952 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1952 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 636 kg more than 1952 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac Seville | 1952 Toyota SA | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | Seville | SA |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1806 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2410 mm |
