2003 Cadillac Seville vs. 2011 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac Seville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac Seville would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac Seville (300 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2011 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Commodore.

Because 2011 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac Seville (407 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Commodore. 2003 Cadillac Seville has automatic transmission and 2011 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2011 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac Seville will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: