2003 Cadillac XLR vs. 1966 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2003 Cadillac XLR is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac XLR (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1966 TVR Griffith. (229 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1966 TVR Griffith. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 775 kg more than 1966 TVR Griffith. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac XLR | 1966 TVR Griffith | |
Make | Cadillac | TVR |
Model | XLR | Griffith |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 67 L |