2003 Cadillac XLR vs. 1985 Ford Sierra
To start off, 2003 Cadillac XLR is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac XLR (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1985 Ford Sierra. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 435 kg more than 1985 Ford Sierra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Sierra. (220 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac XLR | 1985 Ford Sierra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | XLR | Sierra |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4572 cc | 2790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2620 mm |
