2003 Cadillac XLR vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK

To start off, 2003 Cadillac XLR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac XLR (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK. (175 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK weights approximately 475 kg more than 2003 Cadillac XLR.

Because 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Cadillac XLR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK. (330 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK. 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK has automatic transmission and 2003 Cadillac XLR has manual transmission. 2003 Cadillac XLR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: