2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1951 Jaguar MK V
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1951 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1951 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 1175 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Caterham 7 | 1951 Jaguar MK V | |
| Make | Caterham | Jaguar |
| Model | 7 | MK V |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3483 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2900 mm |
