2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1955 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 1955 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | 7 | 12 M |
Year Released | 2003 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2500 mm |