2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 800 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Caterham | Studebaker |
Model | 7 | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2003 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2980 mm |