2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1959 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Ford Fairlane (168 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2003 Caterham 7. (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2003 Caterham 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 1594 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1959 Ford Fairlane has automatic transmission and 2003 Caterham 7 has manual transmission. 2003 Caterham 7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Ford Fairlane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 1959 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | 7 | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 5769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 2094 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 5260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 3000 mm |