2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1962 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Seven. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Caterham 7 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1962 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Caterham 7 | 1962 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Caterham | Lotus |
| Model | 7 | Seven |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2240 mm |
