2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1963 DKW F 11
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW F 11 weights approximately 250 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Because 2003 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 1963 DKW F 11 | |
Make | Caterham | DKW |
Model | 7 | F 11 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 889 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2260 mm |