2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1963 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (200 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1963 Steyr Haflinger. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr Haflinger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Steyr Haflinger weights approximately 110 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Because 1963 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Caterham 7 (210 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 1963 Steyr Haflinger | |
Make | Caterham | Steyr |
Model | 7 | Haflinger |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 41 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 490 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 2840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1360 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 1510 mm |