2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (122 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 810 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | 7 | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2960 mm |