2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1972 Dodge Dart
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Dart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Dart would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Dart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Dodge Dart (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2003 Caterham 7. (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Dodge Dart should accelerate faster than 2003 Caterham 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Dart weights approximately 925 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Dodge Dart (401 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (176 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 1972 Dodge Dart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 1972 Dodge Dart | |
Make | Caterham | Dodge |
Model | 7 | Dart |
Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 5562 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 401 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 102.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.3 mm | 84.1 mm |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2830 mm |