2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1974 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1974 Holden Belmont. (133 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1974 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Holden Belmont weights approximately 826 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Holden Belmont (263 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (176 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 1974 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 1974 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Caterham | Holden |
Model | 7 | Belmont |
Year Released | 2003 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 263 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2830 mm |