2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Caterham 7 (176 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Caterham | Volvo |
Model | 7 | 66 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.3 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1550 mm |