2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 680 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (176 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Caterham 7 | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Caterham | Toyota |
| Model | 7 | Celica |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2640 mm |
