2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1986 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 710 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Because 2003 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 1986 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Caterham | Chrysler |
Model | 7 | Le Baron |
Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 490 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2560 mm |