2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1995 Daewoo No 1
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo No 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo No 1 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 2003 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Caterham 7 (176 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 2003 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1. 1995 Daewoo No 1 has automatic transmission and 2003 Caterham 7 has manual transmission. 2003 Caterham 7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Daewoo No 1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 1995 Daewoo No 1 | |
Make | Caterham | Daewoo |
Model | 7 | No 1 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |