2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1996 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1996 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 1300 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Because 2003 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Caterham 7 | 1996 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | Caterham | Mercury |
| Model | 7 | Villager |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 2960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2860 mm |
