2003 Caterham 7 vs. 1997 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (200 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1997 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Windstar weights approximately 1200 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Because 2003 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Caterham 7 | 1997 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Caterham | Ford |
| Model | 7 | Windstar |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 490 kg | 1690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 5120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1920 mm |
